A geospatial analysis of land ownership in Colorado
View the Project on GitHub Eesterlein/colorado-land-ownership
This project analyzes land ownership patterns across the state of Colorado, with the goal of visualizing:
By mapping and classifying land ownership, this project aims to highlight trends related to land control, equity, and conservation.
This project was developed with the assistance of AI tools to enhance research, streamline analysis, and improve code development efficiency.
The analysis combines two key datasets:
Colorado Statewide Parcel Composite
Provided by the Colorado Governor’s Office of Information Technology, this dataset contains parcel-level data for most Colorado counties, including acreage, land use, and ownership type.
Colorado Ownership, Management, and Protection (COMaP)
Maintained by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, this dataset provides polygon-level data for publicly managed and conserved lands. It complements the parcel composite by filling in missing acreage values and identifying protected private lands.
This project was built using Python and the following libraries:
pandas – for working with tabular datageopandas – for geospatial operations on shapefilesfiona and pyogrio – for reading geospatial filesmatplotlib and seaborn – for visualizationsThere are several important caveats to this analysis:
These limitations are acknowledged throughout the analysis and accounted for in the interpretation of the visual results.
According to the statewide parcel dataset, approximately 62.6% of Colorado land is privately owned, while 37.4% is publicly owned.
This division highlights the significant presence of public lands — including federal, state, and local management — but also reflects the dominant role of private property in shaping the state’s landscape.

Within privately held land, the majority is owned by individuals. Other significant holders include:
This breakdown helps illustrate not just how much land is privately owned — but who holds it and in what form.

Note: Y-axis values are shown in scientific notation (e.g., 1e8 = 100,000,000 acres) to keep the charts readable given the scale of land ownership.
Public lands are concentrated in the mountainous western and central counties.
Counties such as Gunnison, San Juan, San Miguel, Park, Delta, and Mesa show strong public land holdings based on total acreage.

This map reveals that several eastern Colorado counties — including Morgan, Washington, Lincoln, and Kit Carson — have some of the largest areas of privately held land.
Urban counties like Denver, Boulder, and Arapahoe show lighter shading, reflecting lower total acreage due to higher population density and smaller parcel sizes.

Note: Counties such as Rio Blanco and El Paso were excluded due to unreliable acreage values that skewed the results.
This map uses COMaP data to visualize who manages conserved and protected lands across the state.

Note: The categories “Private” and “Private Conservation” both represent conserved private lands, but may differ by the method of conservation — such as fee-title ownership versus a conservation easement.
Gunnison County is my home base and serves as the focus of this additional case study. Nestled in the heart of the Colorado Rockies, Gunnison is often cited as one of the most public land-dominated counties in the state.
This portion of the analysis uses data from the Gunnison County Assessor’s Office combined with statewide public land data to better understand how ownership plays out at the county level.
Over 76% of the land in Gunnison County is publicly owned, with the majority held by federal agencies such as the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The map below visualizes how public and private lands are distributed within the county.

The chart below compares public vs. private land in Gunnison by total acreage, while also breaking down parcel ownership between local and out-of-town residents.

Out-of-town land ownership is a defining feature of the Gunnison property market.

Among out-of-town owners who still live within Colorado, the most common cities of origin are:
These cities are either population hubs or within driving distance of Gunnison, indicating that access to recreation and vacation property likely influence ownership.

Several factors contribute to the high rate of out-of-town property ownership:
The chart below shows how property is held according to classification in the county assessor data.

These patterns suggest a growing trend of formalized and consolidated land control, especially through LLCs and trusts, while individual ownership remains the most common structure. The implications for land use, equity, and policy are significant for rural counties like Gunnison.
This project explored patterns of land ownership across Colorado, combining geospatial analysis with assessor data to reveal the balance between public and private land.
Key takeaways include:
These trends reflect broader shifts in land access, wealth concentration, and conservation strategy — all of which have long-term implications for planning, equity, and the future of Colorado’s landscapes.
Independent research project. The Gunnison County analysis is built from publicly available Gunnison County, Colorado assessor data downloads and GIS parcel data; statewide figures use publicly available COMaP data. It is not an official product of the Gunnison County Assessor’s Office or Gunnison County, is not a system of record, and may contain errors or out-of-date information. Always verify against official county records.